Publisher's Perspective: The Point of No Return

Publisher’s Perspective: The Point of No Return

I‘ve just hung up the phone, after having an interesting conversation with one of my favorite readers. He runs a successful chain of stores in New England, and I’m always more enlightened after having spent even a small amount of time with him. What prompted his call? It’s the alarming rate of labor claims his stores have experienced over the past couple of years. He says the volume of labor claims for alleged defective products has doubled over the past two years. Doubled!

I quickly checked some data and found that AWDA members claim their total return credits have increased from 25.9 percent of total sales in Dec. ’04 to 29.6 percent in Dec. ’05. That’s a staggering 14.3 percent jump in a mere 12 months. What’s going on here?

When I was a factory rep, I serviced the returns for each WD in my territory. I dedicated a couple of hours each month, per WD, to inspecting returns. My time in the return bin area netted a minimum 50 percent decrease in the total credit amount for my product line, and provided me with hundreds of training opportunities. I saw this as productive time, because it saved money for my company and customers. This was a synchronized strategy that delivered benefits to every hand that touched our products throughout the supply chain. At the end of the year, my return credits were always less than 1 percent of my total sales. How has this simple process gotten so far out of hand?

Here’s one simple reason: the reduction of dedicated and trained factory sales and service organizations. This reduction, used by manufacturers as a way to lower operating costs, de-values our industry on so many levels, and we’re just now feeling the impact. Uncontrolled returns and abuses of return policies are just one example of how an insufficiently supported sales and service organization is easily taken advantage of. Other ways include the dilution of brands and the inability to educate and train re-sellers and users on a personal level.

Think about the combined savings and sales growth that could be achieved among just three mid-size WDs on one product line, if they were properly and routinely serviced by just one dedicated factory rep. If the product category were just 5 percent of total WD purchases, then the savings alone would be enough to pay for that rep. Let’s do the math.

If a mid-size WD does $25 million in annual purchases from all of its vendors, then its purchases for this product line would be $1.25 million. If annual returns are 30 percent across the board, then this product line has $375,000 in returns. If a dedicated and properly trained factory rep were able to cut those returns by 25 percent in the first year, he would have saved his company $93,750. Let’s assume that same rep, dedicated to just this one WD, were also able to grow sales and increase his product’s shelf share by 5 percent. That’s an additional $18,750 in revenue. Therefore, after one year, it’s feasible that this factory rep could deliver more than $110,000 in savings and growth to the manufacturer of this particular product line from just one WD customer. Would that be enough to pay his/her salary? What if you multiplied that across three WDs?

When will we stop cost-justifying our way through the complex service and supply system in the automotive aftermarket? This type of strategic implementation is costing manufacturers and their customers a bundle of money. Thirty percent return rates? Reverse-flow logistics are best managed by trained experts at the point of return. I sure hope the industry is not yet at the point of no return.  

You May Also Like

What Will the ‘COVID-Era Consumer’ Do in 2022?

The beauty of the automotive aftermarket is that the economic conditions always seem to work in the industry’s favor.

Online Shopping

Remember the tariffs? Nathan Shipley does. Back in 2019, “that’s all we were talking about as an industry,” Shipley recalled, during his “Aftermarket Outlook 2022” presentation this past November at AAPEX.

Looking back at the “Distribution Preview” in the January 2019 issue of AMN/Counterman, aftermarket leaders consistently expressed concerns that former President Trump’s tariffs – and China’s retaliatory tariffs – could disrupt aftermarket supply chains, leading to higher prices and even production interruptions. Tariffs remained on their radar in January 2020, although it looked like the aftermarket was weathering the storm.

Right To Repair, Trade Associations And You

In the fight for Right to Repair legislation, aftermarket trade groups can’t do it alone.

Veterans Can Be Heroes Off the Battlefield Too

Veterans bring an incredible amount of value to the civilian workplace, in terms of nontechnical and technical skills.

Veterans and Vehicles
What’s Really Driving The Automotive Aftermarket’s Growth?

NPD’s Nathan Shipley looks at the many moving pieces contributing to the industry’s recent spike in demand.

aftermarket growth
Strength In Numbers

The automotive aftermarket is filled with great people. In fact, many say it’s our strong suit.

Teamwork automotive aftermarket

Other Posts

Never Stop Learning

With so much internet-based training content available, it’s never been easier to expand your knowledge base.

Continuing Education
Welcome To 2035 – What Things Might Look Like

The future is what we make it. We need to start addressing technology now so 2035 becomes a bright future.

Future of Transportation
Seems Like Everybody’s Talkin’ About Electric Vehicles

Not only are people talking about EVs, but according to the latest U.S. sales figures, they’re also buying them.

Tesla Electric Vehicle
Still Time To Nominate Someone For Counter Pro Of The Year

We’ll be accepting nominations through Aug. 1.