NHTSA Better Have ‘Good Answers’ for Right to Repair Rebuff

NHTSA Better Have ‘Good Answers’ for RTR Rebuff

The Berkshire Eagle, which endorsed the data-access measure in 2020, is skeptical of NHTSA’s cybersecurity concerns.

While the future of the expanded Right to Repair law in Massachusetts is uncertain, one thing is clear: People are talking about it.

The Berkshire Eagle on June 24 published an op-ed demanding answers from NHTSA and U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg after NHTSA told 22 OEMs that complying with the new Massachusetts law – which Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly approved in November 2020 – would put them at odds with federal vehicle-safety regulations.

In a June 13 letter to the automakers, Kerry Kolodziej, NHTSA’s assistant chief counsel for litigation and enforcement, asserts that open remote access to vehicle telematics could make it easier for cybercriminals – here or abroad – to take control of consumers’ cars, trucks and SUVs and cause mayhem. Citing those cybersecurity risks, Kolodziej maintains that the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act preempts the Massachusetts Right to Repair law.

“Vehicle manufacturers appear to recognize that vehicles with the open remote access telematics required by the Data Access Law would contain a safety defect,” Kolodziej asserts in the June 13 letter. “Federal law does not allow a manufacturer to sell vehicles that it knows contain a safety defect.”

The Berkshire Eagle, which endorsed the data-access ballot initiative in 2020, is skeptical of NHTSA’s cybersecurity concerns.

“The letter neither provides any proof that such a cyberattack on a vehicle has ever occurred nor explains why the NHTSA apparently has no actionable safety concerns regarding telematics being distributed to countless dealership garages across the country,” the newspaper says in its editorial.

The newspaper also questions NHTSA’s rationale and due diligence supporting its assertions in the letter to the OEMS.

“Was there any consideration for other approaches – such as technical guidance to carmakers regarding secure transmission of telematics – instead of simply stonewalling a state law that endured considerable legal review as part of the ballot initiative process?” the Berkshire Eagle asks in the editorial.

Regarding suggestions that state legislators could modify the law to assuage NHTSA’s cybersecurity concerns, the newspaper laments that tweaking the Right to Repair law would require “more clarity on why telematics being sent to an independent mechanic constitutes a ‘safety defect’ while sending them to a dealer-affiliated garage doesn’t.”

The newspaper concludes: “We hope Transportation Secretary Buttigieg and the NHTSA have some good answers, because the federal government should have a better reason than credulous alignment with big business to undermine Massachusetts’ voters and laws.”

You May Also Like

Auto Care Weighing Response to NHTSA Right to Repair Letter

NHTSA asserted that the Massachusetts law “conflicts with and therefore is preempted by” federal law.

In an email blast, Auto Care Association President and CEO Bill Hanvey said the association is working with other Right to Repair supporters to respond to NHTSA’s June 13 letter that urges 22 automakers to ignore the expanded Right to Repair law that Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly approved in November 2020.

OpEd: Mass. Lawmakers Could End Right to Repair Impasse

A Boston Globe editorial suggests that the state Legislature “might be able to break the stalemate.”

Automotive Specialty-Equipment Market Grew 2% in 2022

SEMA estimates that sales growth will remain fairly flat in 2023.

Automotive Aftermarket Outperforms Expectations in 2022

The 2023 Joint Channel Forecast report provides valuable insights and strategic guidance for the automotive aftermarket.

Judge Denies 11th-Hour Bid to Thwart Mass. Right to Repair Law

The automakers had asked the judge for a temporary restraining order to block enforcement of the law.

Other Posts

AAPEX Keynote: Right to Repair Takes Center Stage

Bill Hanvey and Paul McCarthy urged attendees to take action by visiting repairact.com.

Paul McCarthy: This Is a Historic Moment for Consumer Choice

McCarthy calls the REPAIR Act the most important federal legislation for the aftermarket since Magnuson-Moss.

Bill Hanvey: Now’s the Time to Support Right to Repair

Hanvey details how “you and your company can take part in the most important battle our industry has ever faced.”

Robert Roos: Aftermarket Adapting to Unprecedented Change

“We are prepared to meet the challenges of today and tomorrow head-on and with a passion unlike any other.”